Introduction

The All Progressives Congress has moved to challenge a Federal High Court order granting substituted service in a case that could determine President Bola Tinubu’s eligibility for the 2027 election. The party argues the court’s decision was unnecessary, given that Tinubu’s legal team had already filed and served a defense well before the order was granted.

What Happened

In August 2026, Atiku Abubakar and the African Democratic Congress filed suit challenging Tinubu’s qualification to run in 2027, primarily over a discrepancy between the name on his NYSC discharge certificate and his official identity. The plaintiffs initially struggled to serve the president directly, prompting the court to permit service through the APC’s national secretariat on September 16. However, the APC contends that the order was redundant, pointing out that Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN), leading Tinubu’s counsel, had already submitted a defense and that the party was never served with the enrolled order.

Why This Matters

The outcome of this legal tussle could set a precedent for how future election-related challenges are handled in Nigeria’s courts. With INEC already filing a counter-affidavit describing the suit as an abuse of court process, the case underscores the high stakes around Tinubu’s 2027 ambitions and the lengths opposing parties will go to question his eligibility. Legal analysts say the APC’s intervention highlights the importance of due process even in politically charged election disputes.

Key Takeaways

  • The APC filed a September 22 letter to the court arguing the substituted service order was unnecessary.
  • Tinubu’s legal team, led by Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN), filed a defense and preliminary objection as early as September 14 and 15, 2026.
  • Both the defense and objection were acknowledged as received by the plaintiffs’ counsel.
  • INEC has entered the fray, filing a counter-affidavit asserting the suit lacks legal standing.
  • The matter remains before Justice Inyang Ekwo, with the APC’s letter now pending before the registry.

Conclusion

As the 2027 election cycle approaches, legal battles over candidate eligibility are expected to intensify. The APC’s challenge to the substituted service order reinforces the party’s stance that Tinubu’s candidacy is well-supported by due process and proper documentation. Watchers will be monitoring Justice Ekwo’s courtroom for the next hearing, which could shape the procedural landscape of Nigeria’s upcoming presidential contest.